Deepak Kukreja v. Raj Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1167 of 2018(O&M) Date of Decision: September 16 , 2019.

Deepak Kukreja ...... PETITIONER (s)

Versus

Raj Kumar ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present:

Mr. Tara Dutt, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Advocate for the petitioner.

*****

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ***** LISA GILL, J.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has been rendered infructuous as possession of the demised premises has been handed over to the respondent-landlord. Petitioner, thus, seeks to withdraw this petition. Revision petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. ( LISA GILL ) September 16 , 2019.

JUDGE 'om'

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No OMKAR SINGH 2019.09.18 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh