← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/714/2019disposed of

Mulakh Raj And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others

2024-05-16Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CWP-714-2019 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-714-2019 Date of Decision: May 16, 2024 Mulakh Raj and others ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

Mr.A.P.Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.Navneet Singh, Sr.DAG, Punjab.

Mr.Nishant Maini, Advocate for respondent No.4.

........

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) 1.

Petitioner has approached this Court praying of quashing the order/letter dated 19.12.2018, Annexure P-4, passed/issued by respondent No.5 vide which the directions issued to respondent No.6 for stopping/closing the business of the petitioners illegally and arbitrarily and uprooting them from their place of business and allot them to any alternative sites to run their business of meat for their livelihood. 2.

Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 has submitted that similarly situated persons approached this Court by way of filing CWP5587-2011, which has been disposed of by this Court vide order dated 29.03.2011. He submits that case of the petitioners is not different from the same.

MEENU 2024.05.17 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3.

However, learned counsel for the petitioners disputes the same

CWP-714-2019 -2and submits that for redressal of grievances of the petitioners, they will file their representation and the same be considered. 4.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh representation before respondent No.4, i.e. President, Municipal Council, Sultanpur Lodhi, District Kapurthala, within a week from today and in case the same is filed within the stipulated period, respondent No.4 is directed to look into the same and decide it within four weeks from the date of its receipt.

5.

Till then, no coercive action be taken against the petitioners. May 16, 2024 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2024.05.17 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document