← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/2510/2021allowed

Jaskaran Singh And ANR v. Malook Singh

2021-08-23Mr. Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill2 pages

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-2510-2021 (O&M) (1) Jaskaran Singh and another ... Petitioners

Versus

Malook Singh ... Respondent (2) CRM-M-20665-2021 (O&M) Kamlesh Kaur and another ... Petitioners

Versus

Malook Singh and another ... Respondents Date of Decision:- 23.8.2021

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Neeraj Madan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Pal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab in CRM-M-20665-2021.

(proceedings conducted through video conferencing) ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.(Oral) 1.

This order shall dispose off the aforementioned two petitions filed on behalf of Jaskaran Singh, Manjeet Kaur, Kamlesh Kaur and Sumanjeet Kaur wherein the petitioners seek grant of anticipatory bail, having been summoned in a criminal complaint for offences under Sections 302/120-B IPC at Police Station Sadar Jalalabad District Fazilka. 2.

The matters in hand pertains to death of complainant's son, who had been married to Anjana Rani @ Anju Bala. The complainant has come up with the allegation that his son has been murdered by his in-laws. KAMAL KUMAR 2021.08.23 19:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

( 2 ) CRM-M-2510-2021 (O&M) & CRM-M-20665-2021 (O&M) 3.

The petitioners, before this Court, are the 'sala' (brother-in-law) of the deceased and the wife of said 'sala'. The other petitioners in CRM-M-206652021 are sisters-in-law of the deceased. 4.

It is the case of the petitioners that the deceased had in fact died on account of injuries sustained by him in a vehicular accident but the father of the deceased had come out with false allegations against the family of in-laws of his son mainly in order to deprive the wife of deceased of her rights in his estate.

5.

At the time of issuance of notice of motion, the petitioners had been directed to appear before the learned trial Court and to furnish bail bonds for their release on interim bail. Learned counsel for the petitioners has informed that pursuant to interim directions, the petitioners had appeared before the trial Court and furnished interim bail bonds.

6.

Since the matter arises out of a criminal complaint wherein the petitioners have surrendered before the trial Court and furnished interim bail bonds, it is certainly not a case where any kind of custodial interrogation would be required as the matter arises out of a private complaint. In these circumstances, both the petitions are accepted and the interim directions issued by this Court vide order dated 19.1.2021 in CRM-M-2510-2021 and dated 24.05.2021 in CRM-M-20665-2021 are hereby made absolute. 23.8.2021 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) kamal Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No KAMAL KUMAR 2021.08.23 19:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document