Wazir Singh Through Lrs Jawinder Kaur And ORS. v. Surjit Kaur And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1726 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision.18.03.2016 Wazir Singh (now deceased) through his LRs .......Petitioner Vs.

Surjit Kaur and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The prayer for consequential relief is good enought for the plaintiff to be required to pay the ad valorem court fee on the sale consideration of the property. If the plaintiff has sought for assailing a decree and sale that has been effected, notwithstanding the fact that he was himself not party to the sale deed, the fact that the plaintiff is seeking for recovery of possession is the justification for requirement of court fee by application of Section 7(v) of the Court Fee Act. 2.

The order already passed is sustained and the civil revision is dismissed.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 18, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.03.21 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document