Sushil Kumar Bansal v. Pushpa Devi And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR-344-2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.09.2024 SUSHIL KUMAR BANSAL ... PETITIONER

VERSUS

PUSHPA DEVI AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present :

Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 02.12.2019 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Ludhiana whereby an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC filed by the defendantpetitioner herein was dismissed. 2.

During the interregnum, as per the E-Courts website, District Courts Ludhiana, the main civil suit stands dismissed vide order dated 18.12.2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana and hence, the present revision petition has since been rendered infructuous. 3.

Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 23.09.2024 (ALKA SARIN) Ankur JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO Ankur Goyal 2024.09.24 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document