High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/1434/2017disposed of

Makhan Singh (Now Deceased) Thru Lr v. Rai Bahadur Sewak Ram Trust Society And ANR.

2018-08-01Mrs. Justice Anita Chaudhry2 pages

Civil Revision No.1434 of 2017 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) Civil Revision No.1434 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Order:01.08.2018 Makhan Singh (now deceased) through LRs ..Petitioner

Versus

Rai Bahadur Sewak Ram Trust Society and another ..Respondents (2) Civil Revision No.1807 of 2017 (O&M) Makhan Singh (now deceased) through LRs ..Petitioner

Versus

Rai Bahadur Sewak Ram Trust Society and another ..Respondents (3) Civil Revision No.1808 of 2017 (O&M) Makhan Singh (now deceased) through LRs ..Petitioner

Versus

Rai Bahadur Sewak Ram Trust Society and another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

Present:

Mr. Vishal Munjal, Advocate, for the petitioner(s) ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral) Tenant-petitioner is in the three revision petitions against the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the authorities below ordering his eviction on the ground of bonafide requirement of the landlord. It may be noted that the landlord is a public charitable society. Naresh Kumar 2018.08.08 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Civil Revision No.1434 of 2017 (O&M) -2Respondent-landlord had filed a petition on the ground that they wish to built a hospital for convenience of the public at large. It may further be significant to note that similar petition was filed previously also against another tenant i.e. Kailash Chand. He was also ordered to be evicted on the ground of bonafide personal necessity apart from sub-letting which has been upheld by this Court while deciding Civil Revision No.3957 of 2013, decided on 15.07.2013.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, this Court does not find any good ground to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the authorities below.

All the three revision petitions are dismissed. August 01, 2018 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) nt JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Naresh Kumar 2018.08.08 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh