Sanjeev Bansal v. R.K. Pal & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1843 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision.17.03.2015 Sanjeev Bansal .......Petitioner

Versus

R.K. Pal and another ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

There is no scope for any direction when according to the petitioner there are already sufficient observations made in the writ petition that the decree which the decree holder is trying to put in execution cannot operate to defeat the right of the petitioner. He must use all his resourcefullness where the case is pending for execution and see that the execution is either dismissed or disposed of in the manner in which he seeks for. No further direction is necessary. 2.

The revision petition is disposed of.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 17, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.03.18 11:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document