Kamla Devi v. Sultan And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1853 of 2016 Date of Decision.11.03.2016 Smt. Kamla Devi .......Petitioners Vs.

Sultan and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The Presiding Officer, who could not help the party because it was an action plan case, found the technique to close the evidence. I direct reopening of the matter and allow for the evidence to be given. 2.

The impugned order is set aside dispensing with notice to the respondents and the revision petition is allowed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 11, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.03.15 11:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document