Manjit Singh v. Deepak And ANR

Civil Revision No.1609 of 2014 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1609 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Order: 25.09.2017 Manjeet Singh ..Petitioner

Versus

Deepak and another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

Present:

Mr. Parveen Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. R.M.Suri, Advocate, for respondent no.2.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral) Judgment Debtor is in revision petition against order dated 22.11.2013, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karnal. Petitioner-Judgment Debtor had prayed that execution of the decree be kept in abeyance till the disposal of application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC for setting aside the award.

Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly states that the execution proceedings have been closed after the decree has been satisfied. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has come up with a prayer that an application for setting aside the ex-parte award under Order 9 Rule 13 has not been decided.

Learned counsel for the respondent does not have any serious objection to the prayer made.

Learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karnal, is directed to take up and decide the application filed by the petitioner under Order 9 Rule Naresh Kumar 2017.09.28 11:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Civil Revision No.1609 of 2014 (O&M) -213 CPC for setting aside the ex-parte award, if not already decided, within a period of three months from today.

The revision petition is disposed of accordingly. September 25, 2017 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) nt JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Naresh Kumar 2017.09.28 11:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh