Sudesh v. Bhupinder Singh & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1951 of 2016 Date of Decision.16.03.2016 Sudesh .......Petitioner Vs.

Bhupinder Singh and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The grievance of the petitioner is that his evidence has been closed even before all the witnesses are examined. The orders passed are set aside and the plaintiff shall be at liberty of bringing additional evidence. The Court will set appropriate time before when the evidence is to be given and if it finds the petitioner to be still in breach, it can close his evidence and dispose of the case in accordance with law. 2.

The revision petition is disposed of at the stage of admission dispensing with notice to the respondents.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 16, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.03.19 13:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document