Satish Kumar v. Municipal Council Rampura Phul
CR No.1956 of 2016 {1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1956 of 2016 Date of decision:05.12.2016 Satish Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.
Municipal Council, Rampura Phul ... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Achin Gupta, Advocate for the respondent.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) The petitioner-plaintiff is aggrieved of the dismissal of the application seeking ad interim injunction during the pendency of the civil suit seeking permanent injunction against the respondent from forcible interference into suit property, i.e., shop no.15. Mr. Siddharth Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff submits that the petitioner was allotted shop no.15. The alleged allotment is also under challenge. However, the possession held by the trial Court to be illegal cannot be made a ground for other party to seek possession forcibly or illegally. The possession can always be taken, in accordance with law. Mr. Achin Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent-defendant submits that the proceedings under Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as "1972 Savita 2016.12.09 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
CR No.1956 of 2016 {2} Act") have already been initiated. If it is so, the order is coming in his way. In view of the aforementioned, the possession of the petitioner is not disputed but though it is in pursuance to the allotment, in case, any ejectment or eviction proceeding has been initiated under 1972 Act, the possession can be taken only in due course of law but not forcibly and illegally.
With the aforementioned observations, the impugned order is modified. Accordingly, the revision petition stands disposed of. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE December 05, 2016 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2016.12.09 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh