Hem Raj v. State Of Punjab & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Sr. No. 102-B Case No. : C. R. No. 1982 of 2016 Date of Decision : March 07, 2019 Hem Raj Sarpanch ....

Petitioner vs.

State of Punjab and others ....

Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL.

* * * Present :

Mr. A. P. Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Ambika Luthra, Senior DAG, Punjab for respondents no. 1 to 3.

Mr. Umesh Kumar Kanwar, Advocate for Mr. Sukhjinder Singh, Advocate for respondents no. 4 to 8.

* * * DEEPAK SIBAL , J.

(Oral) :

Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that due to afflux of time, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and it be disposed of as such.

Ordered accordingly.

( DEEPAK SIBAL ) JUDGE March 07, 2019 monika Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No.

MONIKA 2019.03.08 13:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document