Rohit Dhir v. Bashir Masih And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2055 of 2015 Date of Decision.23.03.2015 Rohit Dhir .......Petitioner

Versus

Bashir Masih and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

In a suit for recovery of possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act where the plaintiff claims a particular property as the property in his possession and he was dispossessed, the reference to khasra number is wholly irrelevant. If there is a reference to khasra number, I will not take that of any significance for defendant to apply to determine the location of the property in which khasra number it situate. The petitioner will avail whatever recourse he deems appropriate to secure identification of the property and obtain the relief. The assessment of location of the property in a particular khasra number through appointment of commissioner was a needless exercise and rightfully rejected by the Court below.

2.

I find no reason for interference in the civil revision. The civil revision is dismissed.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 23, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.03.24 16:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document