Ramesh Kumar v. Ram Lal

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.3228 of 2004 Date of Decision.07.07.2015 Ramesh Kumar .......Petitioner

Versus

Ram Lal ......Respondent

Present:

Ms. Promila Nain, Advocate and Ms. Anita Wadhwa, Advocate for the petitioner.

None for the respondent.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the premises have already been vacated by the respondents. No further orders are necessary.

2.

The civil revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 07, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.07.08 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document