Dharam Singh v. Krishan Kumar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2353 of 2015 Date of Decision.29.04.2015 Dharam Singh .......Petitioner

Versus

Krishan Kumar and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Goyat, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner is unable to answer any simple question relating to the pleadings. There is written statement already filed by the petitioner admitting to the averments contained in the petition for grant of probate. He now wants to resile from the same and wants to offer evidence on some other pleadings. Without any petition filed for seeking such permission, he cannot give any evidence which is contrary to the written statement which has been filed with a verification by him attesting to the contents of the written statement as true and signed alongside by a counsel representing on his behalf. It is not possible to allow for any evidence in the absence of any particular petition filed to resile from such statement.

2.

I decline to make any interference. The civil revision is dismissed.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE April 29, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.04.30 12:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document