Sukhjit Sandhu v. State Of Punjab And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
CRM M1776 of 2019 Date of Decision: September 30, 2019 Sukhjit Sandhu 2.Petitioner Vs.
State of Punjab and ors.
2..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU. Present: Mr.Sukhjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.G. Jauhar, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
Mr.Rajbir Singh, Advocate for respondent No.4. .
Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to respondent No.2 to decide representation dated 15.12.2018 (P3) moved by petitioner for taking strict legal action against respondents No.4 to 9.
In response to the notice of motion issued by this Court, a detailed reply by way of affidavit of Ankur Gupta, IPS, ASP, Sub Division, Budhlada, District Mansa, was filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. A perusal of the preliminary submissions of the same reveals that representation of the petitioner was duly examined and a report has been submitted by Assistant Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Budhlada, on 08.04.2019 (Annexure R1), and conclusion of the same reads as under:
!"##$% & ' "$()
* +,-
- .+ ,
!
0
.
-
!
-
+ / ,
!
-
-
! / .
+ 12
3
-
-
% 4!
/ ,
!
+ .."""5""$$#"6
-
+ / . % 7 -
.
+ / . + . $8#"$#"6.
%7
.
' .9 $#"6 .+
. . .
. : + !
+ / .
!
+ 12
3
)
2; 2; !
2; < 2 2
2; !
12
3
% 7
. 2=< !
.
7 )>" "$#5$#"? 7 ) >( "$#5$#"?+ !
. ' 2= < !
. .
. .
!
-
+ / .
!
. ! . 12
3
.
. 8 7.. .
12
3
+ /
%
+ 2;
. + 12
3 !
+
% 7
2= !
2 + 2= !
.
'
.. @ In view of the report submitted by ASP, Budhlada there is no occasion for this Court to issue any directions to the official respondents. Consequently, the petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to take recourse to the other remedy available under law and dismissal of this petition would not be construed as an expression of opinion on merits of the same.
September 30, 2019 (MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU) sanjay JUDGE Whether speaking/ reasoned:
Yes/ No.
Whether Reportable:
Yes/No.