Tabassum And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-583-2021 Decided on : 22.01.2021 Tabassum and another . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL (Through Video Conferencing) PRESENT:

Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Farukh Abdullah, Advocate for respondent No.4.

**** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (Oral) Petitioners have filed this writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty from respondents No. 4 to 10. On the last date of hearing while issuing notice of motion, learned State counsel was directed to find out the existence of alleged threat. Learned State counsel on instructions has apprised this Court that a fabricated story has been brought-forth in the petition in question. In fact, there exists no threat perception to the life and liberty of the petitioners and the averments made in paragraph 15 of the petition, has been found to be incorrect. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the instant petition may be disposed of, in the light of the statement made by learned State counsel in Court today.

In the circumstances and in the wake of statement made by learned State counsel, the instant petition stands disposed of. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE January 22, 2021 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2021.01.22 15:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh