Ramesh Chand Jain v. Vimal Parsad Jain And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR-2027-2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.07.2022 Ramesh Chand Jain ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

Vimal Parsad Jain & Anr.

... Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present :

Mr. Surender Saini, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner. Ms. Liza Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Ravish Bansal, Advocate for the respondents. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) CM-8383-CII-2022 AND CM-8384-CII-2022 The present applications have been filed for preponing the date of hearing in the main case as well as for withdrawal of the main case (CR2027-2017) on the ground that the applicant-petitioner does not want to pursue the main case (CR-2027-2017) any longer. Notice of the applications.

Ms. Liza Bansal, Advocate appearing for Mr. Ravish Bansal, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the non-applicant/respondents and states that she has no objection if the present applications are allowed and the main case (CR-2027-2017) is permitted to be withdrawn. For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the main case (CR-2027-2017) is taken on board today itself. YOGESH SHARMA 2022.07.19 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

Chandigarh

CR-2027-2017 (O&M) -2CR-2027-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to pursue the case.

In view of the above, the present revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 18.07.2022 Yogesh Sharma ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE : Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : YES/NO YOGESH SHARMA 2022.07.19 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

Chandigarh