Nirmal Kaur v. Paramjit Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2417 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision.04.04.2016 Nirmal Kaur widow of Bhagat Singh .......Petitioner Vs.

Paramjit Singh ........Respondent

Present:

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The revision petition is filed against the dismissal of the restoration application filed under Order 9 Rule 9 CPC. It is an appealable order under Order 43 CPC.

2.

The revision petition is dismissed but with liberty to file an appeal before the competent court.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE April 04, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.04.05 14:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document