Manish Atri v. State Of Haryana

-1CRM-M-1604 of 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1604 of 2019 Date of Decision: 04.04.2019 Manish Atri

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present:- Mr. Balram Prashar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Sukhwinder Singh, Advocate, for the complainant. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant on his own, though he has not been impleaded as party. The same is taken on record.

Through this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case arising from FIR No.342 dated 26.09.2018 registered under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 201, 120-B IPC at Police Station Sector 56, District Gurugram. Producing the photocopy of alleged compromise between the parties, learned counsel for the complainant submits that complainant has no objection to the grant of regular bail to the petitioner. Heard.

Considering overall facts and circumstances, but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed. Consequently, petitioner is ordered to be released on bail during pendency RAVINDER SINGH 2019.04.05 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-2CRM-M-1604 of 2019 of trial, on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned.

(RAMENDRA JAIN) April 04, 2019 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2019.04.05 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document