Neena Rani v. Jaimal & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.244 of 2016 Date of Decision.15.01.2016 Neena Rani .......Petitioner Vs.

Jaimal and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The counsel for the petitioner says that he does not argue the case on merits and he will move an application before the Court for assessment of appropriate mesne profits. He is at liberty to file whatever application he thinks is possible under the law. 2.

The revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn but with liberty as aforesaid.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 15, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.01.18 12:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document