Hitachi Plant Technologies India Pvt.Ltd. v. Sanjib Kumar Jena And Others









 

 









  



 
 

!

"

#"

$












%&'
($)"


"



   !

"#$%&!
"
 
$&'

" +
,"
%$
% -
 
."

*"



,"
%&'
($)"
-

" 
 /

*"




000
RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.

1/2



"



"


34 53 35/6
*

'7

$


8$"
 9-
$"$ ")
 
:

**
$ "
"

"
;
$
//
 
.
'7


. <*"
."
"&
.
*
: )

132

<*..
.

$
."
"
  =$
".
.
*")
&$
:

.: *"7"

+>

   

 

    

   



   

        

   

   

      

     

!

      



   



       

"         #$

         %  


   

" 

    

  "
         

 

  

 

"

 

       %   

     &   

    

       

   ' 

    

 

     1?2

. <*"


*"
)
)*7
. <*"
.

**
$ "
"

"
;
$
//

."
"&
.

*


"$


*..<" 
:
**

@,A
'7

. > )*7
 
**)
"

5? 5B 35/3
..
 '
")
$ "
$ 
/;
.

**)
"
'7



*"
.
45
7

 
'7
)C

*7)
.
"7
."


*"
. 
)


$
 '""

")
.
%
D/
89
"
:
%
/4
.

%*.
.


$ -

$

 
'""
$ "
"

"
;

$
//8 9
 

1D2

"
$"
)


**

:
 "


"
.
*"


$"

'

*.7
." -
'$

$"
*


**"$7
.
"
)$ 
'



*..

1E2



"

"
$ 
."

*"


" 
 /

*"



142


 /
:
"


 
:
"
$
.

:

")
 </BB;<355D

.


'

'7
" 
 /-
:"-

 


"
*"


$"
.
:
1;2

 *"
**)
"

 5? 5B 35/3-

" 
 /
: **  


"
, "<%" 7>,"C
 
" 
8,39
$ 
 /;
.

."
"
 
F")
.
"G



.:
..+>
() *

   $

    

    



 

  $  

 +) 



    

  

 

    

   $      

 $   '     $

  ,   

  

  

     

 

 

  $   

  +

'

)



     

 



  $)  -     $  

 

 $ 
./0-





  

 



+ )

$ 





      +) 



   

     $  

 +

)  

      

 

  

 

$  

$     $       

+

)

 

+$   

 )$

  

   $   

   

    

 

    

  



 

 

 )1 





    2  +        ) + ) -      

    
./0-   

     

    



       
./0-       $

 





  



       
./0-

       

      $     

$

       



  

 

  

       

 

  ' 

  

   

     





3 162


.
")
:


$


" 

$ "

."
$ 
 /;
.

**)
"-
:"'7

*"
.



")

)*7)
.

" 
:
)) 
..

$
.
"*"
" "$$"
:

)*7
:
$ "

 :




 "$*
)*

)*
.

*"
.
45
7
:
) 

1B2

!"
$ 
."

*"
$')


"
.
*"


"

'
*.7
."
 
$"
:



"


"
$'


 
)*7
$

'

"
  

:
  
.

)*7"
 "
"$
.
:
 $'&

"
:
" H
I*
 

+ )     $   

  $    

  

  

    

  ,

  

2


 +

)       

  $ 

   $

 

   


4

  +

)  

 $ 

$  

 

   

 

 1/52


$**"
.

-
"
$ 
."

*"
"
$*
Pearlite Liners Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Manorama Sirsi, AIR 2004 SC 1373, CR No.6064 of 2002 titled Madan Lal Vs. The Meham Coop. Sugar Mills Limited and others decided on 04.03.2015, Lekh Raj Khurana Vs. Union of India (UOI) AIR 1971 SC 2111, Apollo Tyres Ltd. Vs. C.P. Sebastian, JT 2009(8) SC 182 
Executive Committee of Vaish Degree College, Shamli and others, AIR 1976 SC 888





$"
:


&$"


$ %
/D
.

%*.
.


$
."
"


"

"
.
")
.
"
:
'


*..

$
'
" 

"
:
'C>:

'

*.7
."



$


"
.
"
 *"$
.")
'
."



$"


'"
.


$

'

.")

*" 

")
.
%
/D
.

%*.
.


"
.

*..
:

" $ '7
7
*"
$ "
"
?//
.

 $
.
 


)

'

$'&
)"
.
&$ 
"
'7
" )

:


 
.

"
.
)*7)

':
)*7


"*"
 ' 
'7
$
'7

.
")
"

%
! $"

:


 
.
" 
 $
.

:"C)


, )
:
"
" $
$ "
 $ "
 *$


$"
:


&$"



" *
.
.")
.
"
.
*"



"


"

'



$

'"" $ "
%
/D8'9
.

%*.
.


1//2


*" 
 


.

7
.

"
I*

$
$
'7

A'
*I
$"

Pearlite Liners Pvt. Ltd.'s case (supra)
. <*"




$"7
' 7
"


$
"

"
 
.

*..

 
.

*..



 
.
*$'
)*7)



"
"
?//
.

 $
.
 

 

.
*"
)*7)
:
$
'

"
'7

")
.

"
':

*"

*"
")
.

**)
"-

"
.

*..
:"

*
:
7
"."
'7


$"
:$
)$

."

"
.
*"


"
:

'

"
$ "

:
%$

$

'
:

$
 $
'
":


"7
*



$"
 
&$"



"
".
:

'
.")
*"
.

"

1/32


Lekh Raj Khurana's case (supra)-

A'
%$*")
$"
*
$

$ "

"
"$
.
) "

 "-


'


.
7
*"
.""
'7
"
?//
.

 $
.
 -
"$
.
$"
&$ 

'
C

"
.
*"


"
$
")
.

"

:

$
 

"

"
.
")
 '""
$ "
%
/D8'9
.

%*.
.

..
 

:"C)
 .
$ "
 $ "
 *$
-
/BD;

1/?2





*"*
.
:

:
"


")
.

"
.
"-

"
=$
$'


.
"

'
"


'


.
"$)  :"

*$'
"

'
)

.")
"

"
.
"
?//
.

 $
.
 
"
:"
" )
 $ 
.

)

:"C"
$ "

 $ "
!:
"
:"

$"7
' 7



'"
.
) "7
' 
)*
'7

$
"

'
7
"
I*
  

." "
"$

1/D2


.."
) 
'7
" 
 /

*"





$*" "7
&$"


.

 
$"
$ "
33;
.

 $
.
 

'
C


)*$ 




"-

'
**"


"
$*
Chandrasekhar Singh and others Vs.

Siya Ram Singh and others, 1979 AIR 1-
Second Appeal (MD) No.678 of 2014

A. Jawaharlal Vs. Thayammal


5B 5D 35/E
'7

, "
 
$"-
Appeal (Criminal) of 725

State through Special Special Cell, New<< Vs. Navjot

Sandhu @ Afshan Guru and others


5B 5E 355?
'7

%$*")
$"

CRP (PD) Nos.1020, 1021 and 1022 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009

The Ootacamund Club Vs.

H.S. Mehta


5/ /5 355B
'7
, "
 
$"

1/E2


"
.
."
&$

)

'
**


.
.

*" 
 


."

&$

) -

*:"

.

 
$"
$ "
"
33;
.

 $
.
 

'
I*


'
.
  $
.
.

 

*")"


:

."


'


'
*$


 


*"*
.
:

I""

"7
$*" "7
&$"


.

 
$"

'
C
:
..$
") 7

'


*"

"

)



**
."
"&
.

*



"

"."-

"

"


**'

")
.
"

"
D?
$
/
 

.



."
*"  

"

""

7

=$ 

7
)"

1/42


I*"


F:G
$""

"

"
;
$
//
8 9
$
&$ 
 
.

A'
*I
$"

$"
*"$)
.

A'
*I
$"


:
.


:
"
'7
A'
*I
$"
$ "
"
/D/
.

 $
.
 


:
.

!:
$ 
7
 
) -
'$
 
&$ 
*" 

."

'
) 

Virender Kumar Dixit Vs. State of

U.P., 2014(9) ADJ 506 
Bhargavi Constructions and another Vs. Kothakapu Muthyam Reddy and others, 2017(4) RCR (Civil) 359.

1/;2


:
.
$)
 :
'7

A'
*I
$"

Pearlite Liners Pvt. Ltd.'s case (supra)
:
:
.:

Apollo Tyres Ltd. case (supra)
:

$"
.:
'7

 
$"

Madan Lal's case (supra)
:$
.")

:
.



""

7

=$ 
 





"
.
*"


"

'
*.7
." "$ 

$"
'7

""7
$
$


$
"
:
" H
I*
"
"


"
"$
.
:

 
.

*..


.

7
.

I*
 $
$

Pearlite Liners Pvt. Ltd.'s case (supra).
1/62

"

" 
""

"'-

" 
*

:
)*$ 
"


34 53 35/6
*

'7

$


8$"
 9-
$"$ ")

"'7

 


"

"

'
"&

"
 
$&'














"#'!
3/ /3 35/6

"
J"
  <%*C

 <
J"
*"'

 <