Gurdyal Singh v. Harnam Singh And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2531 of 2015 Date of Decision.29.01.2016 Gurdyal Singh .......Petitioner Vs.

Harnam Singh and others ........Respondents

Present:

None for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

There is no representation for the petitioner at the time when the matter is called. There had been no representation even at the previous hearing.

2.

The revision petition is dismissed for default of appearance and non-prosecution.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 29, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.01.30 12:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document