Jasmer Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:05.03.2020 Jasmer Singh ......Petitioner Vs State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH Present:Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sammi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
**** RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) CRM-W-145-2020 In view of order dated 29.01.2020, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record interlocutory orders passed by the Civil Court from time to time.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the interlocutory orders are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
Applications stands disposed of.
CRWP No.913 of 2020 By way of filing the present petition under Article
226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks issuance of necessary directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioner qua his life and personal liberty from being invaded by respondent No.4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondent No.4 is involved in grabbing the property situated adjoining to the property of the petitioner for which civil suit is pending in the competent Court.
Precisely, in the context of threat perception of the petitioner, he has already moved a representation before respondent No.2 and the same has not been adverted to so far. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3.
On asking of the Court, Mr. Jagmohan Singh Ghumman, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of Staterespondents No.1 to 3. Respondent No.2 shall ascertain the truth in the allegations of the petitioner and would pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Respondent No.2 would be at liberty to assess the threat perception of the petitioner and would act in accordance with law. Respondent No.2 would also be at liberty to join the petitioner or any other person acquainted with the facts of the case. Respondent No.2 shall form an independent opinion, without being influenced by any statement of fact
recorded hereinabove.
It would be appreciated, if needful in deciding the representation is done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Petition stands disposed of.
March 05, 2020 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) geeta JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No