Jitender Soni v. Manisha Verma

Civil Revision No. 2542 of 2015 -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 2542 of 2015 Date of Decision: 10.4.2015.

Jitender Soni .......Petitioner

Versus

Manisha Verma .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present:

Mr. Yowan Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** SABINA, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 12.2.2015 (Annexure P-5) whereby evidence of the petitioner was closed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner wanted to examine the doctors with regard to treatment taken by the respondent for her mental disease. In this regard, petitioner had deposited the requisite diet money qua the doctors who were required to be summoned. Petitioner be granted one opportunity to enable him to conclude his evidence. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it would be just and expedient to grant one opportunity to the petitioner to enable him to conclude his evidence.

Accordingly, this petition is allowed. Impugned order dated 12.2.2015 is set aside. Trial Court is directed to grant one GURPREET SINGH 2015.04.20 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Civil Revision No. 2542 of 2015 -2effective opportunity to the petitioner to enable him to conclude his evidence at his own risk and responsibility subject to payment of ` 2500/- as costs. Costs be deposited with District Legal Services Authority, Gurgaon. Thereafter, the Trial Court shall proceed further with the case, in accordance with law. (SABINA) JUDGE April 10, 2015 Gurpreet GURPREET SINGH 2015.04.20 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh