Narinder Madher Thr Attorney v. Pardeep Kumar & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2574 of 2016 Date of Decision.08.04.2016 Narinder Madher .......Petitioner Vs.

Pardeep Kumar and another ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. D.R. Punia, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner has grievance that his side was closed when the witness did not come. The grievance is that on three earlier occasions when the witnesses had come, there was no cross-examination by the defendant and on one occasion when he did not come, the Court has closed the evidence. The order passed by the Court below is set aside on payment of costs of `5000/- within a period of one week from the date of receipt of copy of this order, failing which the order passed already will stand.

2.

The revision petition is disposed of dispensing with notice to the respondents.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE April 08, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.04.12 13:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document