Sakattar Singh v. Punjab National Bank And ANR
2 IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE S STATES OF PUNJAB AND ANDIGARH HARYANA AT CHA
34 51!2&,&
&&& 011 &&&16 1 !"
" # $% &'( )*%
* " ) & '()
& ) *)
+,
& ',-)
./
* ) +'&
,- ./
#
' #
0 #/#
! "
" 1 1 &#
# $
%%
'
$# 3) )
!!
#
# #
4 + 0 #
/#%
%"
' 1 #
,
4 :6 +
,
0 #
# #
#
4 4 !%+
8
9 5 #
)## $
,
'
3 ) # 5
"
5
- #
% 0
# "4& 267%
#
#
3#
,
3
, #
, $("
3
#
#
:
=
$
,
#
/
/#
"
"
' %7
$ 3 )
)
3
' ' 2
"
'
3 ) 4 # # /#
5# "
5 "& ;< $
7
' %!
"
/#
'
3 )
' %7 7
)
#
# '
) '
'
/ /#
-.-.&(//.&'&$0
5 #
5 "
'
%7
)
4
Sube Singh h and another vs. State of Harya ana and another, 2013 (4) R.C.
R.
102, wherein a Division Bench h of this Court has held that ev ven (Criminal) after the con nviction, if the parties have settl led the dispute amicably and ha ave decided to l ive in peace and harmony, this C Court, in exercise of powers und der Section 482 Cr.P.C., can compound the offe ence.
!
3
* &'$'&! !"
"#$%5 9'"
# # # '
$3 ) 3
# #
/
# 3
*+ ,*
&'&(!# &') 5 9'"
# #8 9
8 9 # #
$
) #
3
#
,
0
$
5 /
0 #
/# %
% "
0
0 ## #
"
)
#
"
1 &#
)
"
3 #
/
) ) # /#
! &# /# %
% "
0
# 5 5 + # #
'
# 2&,& (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE
Wheth Wheth er speaking/reasoned er reportable Yes/No Yes/No