High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/2864/2011dismissed

Birdi Cloth House And ANR. v. Vinay Dhir And ORS.

2025-05-21Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl13 pages

"#$

! % "#$ & '

("#$

) (

*(! +$ , & #

, -

) ' +. *- /- # " 010 2

3 010# 45* ! !

6 "

' % " " 7 " (

-* , % ,

-, " "$ , --

, &

- , ( - , & #

(

$ -$ "

-, &

(& #

$ (

, 6 ! "

* -

", (

- &

) , ,%

) , - !

(

( % &

(

8- & #

( (

, $ -

" "

" ,

+9&

+9"

: ;8,

( !

: ! !

" 8 (

6 (

18&

$ , !" -

(! "

*(! (

!"#$ $% &'&( ! ) *+,-& , - - <- ' ! $ 9+

5 '

$ #

25 =2 5 89> &

$ ,

! " *(! & #

, , $ - &

(

, (

) -

, (

- & #

# - ) "

)

( -

- ( - - ?

(

( & #

, , $ -

(

- - ( - & #

1 @

*(! & #

, , $ -

( !

$ -

) 2

5 $

(( ", !, !!9009" (

& ,

)

6 , 6 - ! -

, (, *

" !

(

( !"

(

& , ! " % - , ,

-, @ ! ,

) .- /$ 0$ 1 *0!1#$!

12**1 0 0 3!#0#

0$ 0!

#6 2.

Whether the respondent is in arrears rent? OPA 3.

Whether the property is unfit and unsafe for human habitation? OPA 4.

Whether the respondent has impaired the value and utility of the property without the consent of petitioner? OPA 5.

Whether the respondents have made additions and alternations without the consent of landlord? OPA 6.

/$ 0$ 0$ # 1 0 !# *!4* 01 4 % 1 0$ 8 112

#1* ##!096

Whether the present petition is bad for partial ejectment? OPR 8.

Whether the site plan is incorrect? OPR 9.

Relief."

8 @ ,

, $

8 @ $ *(! ;

$ ?

(

$ " , -

?)A'

(",

" -

( !

(

( !

5 , .:$ , ( !

6 "

*" .:+" $ ,

" ! 9009&, - $

-, , $ &,-$

(, (-

- & #

# &

" ,"

(

.$ ,

( $ -

- -

" " - $ ,"

, ,

3 4 ' 2 5 010 #

-, ) "2(c). "

*1 : means any person for the time being entitled to receive rent in respect of any building or rented land whether on his own account or on behalf, or for the benefit, of any other person, or as a trustee, guardian, receiver, executor or administrator for any other person, and includes a tenant who sublets any building or rented land in the manner hereinafter authorised, "

#1 2 1; 0!;

01 0!;

!"!80!0* **1 <"

# -$ $

, , ,

$ ,! ! ! $ ! & "

! " ,

"," $ ?)" ,!

" -

( ! 9 @

) @ & #

# " $ *(! +" ,$ $

(

) ?

" & #

# %

(

! $

!&, - $

-: ?) ,

( !

):!

, ,%

- !

$ ,

"7 @ -*

, , ",

! -

7 ,

, - & #

# - - $

( ,

$ (

! - ,

(

$ -

!,%, !

, "

(

, -

, % *- -

( - , (&, - $

- , - (

- !

):!

?) * '

(",

):!

) 6 !

&, - $- & #

- ?)

* '

(" ,

" - , (

- @

(

, - $ (

; @ (!

- 6 ! "

) , !

( *- ,

- ,

, -

$ - * -

, ,%

(, !

(

$ - ", -

! $

* ! $"

$ -:

! ! !

& " $ ,

- % 18

" ! +

" ,$-

$ $ $" ' +215 010 # $ 6

(

6 (

! ! -

(

' +215 #

-, ) "(4)Where a landlord who has obtained possession of a building or rented land in pursuance of an order under subparagraph (i) or sub-paragraph (ii) of paragraph (a) of sub-

" section (3) [does not himself occupy it or, if possession was obtained by him for his family in pursuance of an order under sub- paragraph (i-a) of paragraph (a) of sub-section (3), his family does not occupy the residential building, or, if possession] was obtained by him on behalf of his son in pursuance of an order under sub-paragraph (iv) of paragraph (a) of sub-section (3), his son does not occupy it for the purpose for which possession was obtained, for a continuous period of twelve months from the date of obtaining possession or where a landlord who has obtained possession of a building under sub-paragraph (iii) of the aforesaid paragraph (a) puts that building to any use or lets it out to any tenant other than 0$ 0 0 "!70 2 1; !0 0$ 0 0 5$1 $# 4

"!70 ;9

*9 01 0$ 10 1** 21 1 !

70!8 0$0 $ #$**4 #01 01 1## ##!112#7$4!*!81 0 * 0$ 10 1** #$**;= 1 771 !8*9."

0 &

18" ,

6 , ,

$ $"

! , , 6 -

(

6 !

, * , (

(

@ "

(& #

, , $ - @

! , - ( (-

)

: *(! & #

;8",

(

: ! "

( "

, $

) 18

+9@ "

( , ,

" !

) %

@ (

!2 5"

( *(! <- ' ! "

" , -

@ $ *(!

-, ) "-$ 1 #0 &-',&'&(&+-'&'&( 2* 700$0!0 !#0$ ;!00 7# 12410$0$ 0!

#0$00$ 1## ##!112 0$ $1 4 !8 1,>&?(@A)$!"$15=%

0 8

5) *$!B$

!20

01#:#4% 70

;!# #:C$#

$ 1"

01 0$ # 1 0>**9 0$ 18$

70!1

!8#

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant affirms that the possession of subject premises has been taken over.

3. $ !## 12 5$ 0$ "!#!1

0!0!1!#;!0!4* 5$ 0$ 0 0 #4% 70

;!# #$#4

* 8**9 #01 010$ # 1 0>**9 !0$ !81 4 0$ 2!*!8 120$ "!#!1

0!0!1$#4

## 490$

;

1 0#5 **#4911 !0

7$ #120$!#1 0.

( $

;

1 0 ! )8 " 1$ !8$ *0 5!0$ #!;!* #!00!1 5$!* !#;!##!8 7$** 8 49 0 0 01 %8;

0 ## 49 0$!# 1 0

$1*!8 1 7*!!8 * "

01 ## 49 0$ * !* 1 0 $ 270# ! 0$ 7# 5

0$0

1## ##!1120$ 0 0

;!# #$4

0= #0 01 1 ## 49 0$ 70!8 1 0 $

;

1 0 *05!0$0$ #!;!* 8;

0# !# 14 $*2120$ # 1 0>**1 0$0 0$

0!0!1 $# 71;

!2 701# #0010$ 1## ##!1$"!84

0= , 20 4 !

2*9 3;!!80$ 710 0!1120$ 0!

#0$

;

1 0 ! )8 7# $ * 0$0 ! "!

5 12 0$ ;!00 1#!0!1 12 1## ##!1 4 !8 0= ! 70!1

!8#!05#10 ## 90181!010$ 2 0$ 0!*# #!7 #7$ 7!#!1 51* 4

*9 7 ;!7 #0!1$

;

1 0$ *#21**15# :E"!

5120$ ;!00 1#!0!10$0 #0010$ 1 ## 49 0$ 0 10 1** 1## ##!1 $#

0= 1 70!1 12 0$ 1

;!00!8

"!70!1 4# 7 12 #

7!2!7 #0 8 !8 !;

71# 0!0!#$15 "

10 ## 90181!01 0$ 2! 0!*#01 3;! 0$ !"*#0!0$ 47=8 1 12 * 8* 1#!0!1 # !0 51* ;10 01

!8 7!#!11

*97 ;!7D #0!1$

*!#0$

!#;!## 5!0$1091 #01 71#0#: [Emphasis Supplied]

6. A similar view was taken by the Supreme Court in Vinod Kumar Verma ν. Manmohan Verma where on an averment by Respondent/ landllord that possession of the premises has already been taken over, 0$

;

1 0$ * that nothing further survives in the Appeal and disposed the Appeals as being infructuous. The order being brief is extracted below" "Leave granted.

0 0$ 0!;

12 $ !8 12 0$ #

*# 0$ * 71# *

!814 $*2120$ **1 A # 1 0 #4;!0# 1 !#0 70!1# 0$0 0$ 1## ##!1 12 0$

;!# #!D #0!1$#* 94

0= 1"

490$ **1 A # 1 0 $0 4 !8 0$ 1#!0!1 0$ #

*# $"

15 4 71;

!2 701# 5$!7$ $"

2!* 8!#0 0$ 2!* %8;

0 1 0 &,'&&''+&+'F&''+ ## 490$ !8$1 012 ) *$! 0 5 ) *$! ! 1 (? 12 &''@ 1--?12&''+ "!

5! 1(?12&''@49 5$!7$ 0$ "!#!1

0!0!1 2!* 49 0$ 0>

**0 5# !#;!## 1 12 "!70!1 5# 22! ;

!7 0$ 1## ##!1 $# * 9 4

0= 1"

49 0$ **1 A # 1 0 ! 1 "!

5 10$!8# "!"

#!0$ #

*#771 !8*90$

*# !# 1# 12#!2 701# 0 !;1 !29#0#"70 $

5!**4 1 1 #0171#0#: [Emphasis Supplied]

7. Various Coordinate Benches of this Court have also similarly held that the tenant's Petition have become infructuous in view of possession being taken...... xxx xxx xxx

16. 9 "

020 0$ ##!8120$ ;

8 0$ # 1 0>**9 140! 1## ##!1 12 0$ #4% 70

;!# # ! 771 7 5!0$ *5 # #7$ 0$ "!#!1

0!0!1$#4

2!* 7$** 8!80$ 1 120$ * !*1 05$!7$$#158! 2 !0!15# 70 $# * 9 4

* ;

0 0$ 18$ 70!1

!8#$!#5# 71 490$ 1 0!!0#1 #0 &-',&'&( &+-'&'&( 0$ # 7! 7;#07 # 0$ "!#!1

0!0!1$#4 71;

!2 701#G @ *(! ( - - <-' !$ 9+

25 89 A

$ , -$ !

( *(!

- & #

$ -

( -

( !

$ -

(

$ , -$

#$%& '( ) * Davinder Kumar ?

(> B >= ? - B >=