Pardeep Singh And ANR v. Manjit Singh And ORS

Anuradha 2016.05.19 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR No.2668 of 2016 1 Sr. No. 105

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR No.2668 of 2016 Decided on : 18.05.2016 Pardeep Singh and another ......Petitioner

Versus

Manjit Singh and others .......Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI

Present:

Ms. Isha Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. R.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the respondent No.1..

****

1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed against the concurrent orders dated 06.03.2014 and 08.02.2016 passed by the learned Courts below evicting the petitioner from the demised premises.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that the petitioner will not press this petition on merits and will vacate the premises voluntarily on or before 30.04.2017 without forcing the respondent to file an execution petition and will continue to pay the monthly contractual rent in advance by the 7th of every month, and pay the other admissible charges regularly. He further undertakes to pay up to date of arrears

CR No.2668 of 2016 2 of rent, if any, within a period of one month from today. Learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, has also accepted this offer on the condition that the petitioner will file an undertaking to the above effect before the Executing Court within a month, with the condition that in the event of any default, this petition should be deemed to be dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has accepted this condition. The revision petition is disposed of in the above terms. (AJAY TEWARI) May 18, 2016 JUDGE anuradha