Prabhjot Singh And ORS. v. State Of Punjab And Another

2024:PHHC:037348

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-2825-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.03.2024 Prabhjot Singh & others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab & another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Mr. Vinay Kumar Malhotra, DAG, Punjab.

GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.0066 dated 19.06.2022 registered at P.S. Shimlapuri, District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana, under Sections 384, 120-B, 506 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act and all subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of a compromise stated to have been effected between the parties. 2.

Vide order dated 19.01.2024, the parties had been directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court so as to get their statements recorded qua the factum of compromise.

3.

Report of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ludhiana, has been received, wherein it has been reported that the statements of accused/petitioners, namely, Prabhjot Singh @ Bhui, Prabhjot Singh @ Monu, Rupinder Kaur, Gaganpreet Kaur and Harjot Singh as well as of VIMAL KUMAR 2024.03.15 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-2825-2024 (O&M) -2complainant Jagroop Singh have been recorded to the effect that they have compromised the matter amongst themselves. 4.

The complainant Jagroop Singh in his statement has stated that he has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed. 5.

The learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ludhiana, has specifically opined that the parties have entered into compromise without any coercion or undue influence.

6.

In view of the aforesaid compromise and bearing in mind the law laid down by Full Bench of this Court in 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.0066 dated 19.06.2022 registered at P.S. Shimlapuri, District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana, under Sections 384, 120-B, 506 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act and all subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. 14.03.2024 (GURVINDER SINGH GILL) Vimal JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No VIMAL KUMAR 2024.03.15 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document