Krishan Kumar v. Parkash Chand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2266 of 2018 Date of decision:06.04.2018 Krishan Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.
Parkash Chand ... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. S.K.Bishnoi, Advocate for the petitioner.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) The present revision petition is directed against the impugned order dated 16.12.2017 (Annexure P-8), whereby, objections to the execution application filed by judgment debtor/petitioner, have been dismissed.
Concededly, civil appeal against the judgment and decree dated 21.01.2017 has been filed which is pending adjudication before the Lower Appellate Court. The manner and mode in which remedy availed, is not correct procedure. In fact, the petitioner has separate remedy to pursue the interim application which according to learned counsel for the petitioner is pending adjudication.
While upholding the order under challenge, revision petition stands disposed of.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE April 06, 2018 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2018.04.06 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh