High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/1686/2021disposed of

Sukhbir v. State Of Haryana And Others

2021-01-29Mr. Justice Karamjit Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1686-2021 Date of Decision:-29.1.2021 SUKHBIR ... Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH Present:- Mr. Ankur Sidhar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Kirpal Singh Thakur, AAG, Haryana.

KARAMJIT SINGH , J. (Oral) Case has been heard through video conferencing on account of COVID-19 Pandemic.

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner-Sukhbir for issuance of direction to the respondents to get investigated the FIR No.382 dated 9.11.2020 registered under Section 346 IPC at Police Station Hansi Sadar, which was lodged by the petitioner regarding missing of her daughter Priyanka.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Kirpal Singh Thakur, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. GAURAV SOROT 2021.01.29 14:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

( 2 ) CWP-1686-2021 The petitioner has also filed CRWP-10485-2020 in the nature of Habeas Corpus seeking direction to the concerned authorities to get released his daughter Priyanka from the illegal custody of one Nand Lal. In the said connected matter, Priyanka, who is presently lodged in Nari Niketan, Karnal made statement before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karnal to the effect that she is not ready to go with her father Sukhbir. The said petition has been disposed of by this Court, today itself. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has already given legal notice (Annexure P-11), but the authorities have failed to take any action in this regard.

In the light of the abovesaid, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Superintendent of Police, Hansi to look into the legal notice dated 16.1.2021 (Annexure P-11) and to decide the same in accordance with law within a period of 15 days of the receipt of the certified copy of this order. Respondent No.3 is further directed to consider this writ petition as fresh representation of the petitioner and to take the same into consideration while looking into the legal notice (Annexure P-11).

( KARAMJIT SINGH) 29.1.2021 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking?

Yes / No Whether reportable?

Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2021.01.29 14:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document