Om Singh v. Sham Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2823 of 2016 Date of Decision.25.04.2016 Om Singh .......Petitioner Vs.

Sham Singh ........Respondent

Present:

Mr. Chirag Wadhwa, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

There is simply no justification for the petitioner to arrive before this Court to complain that the Appellate Court should not have granted an interim direction in favour of the plaintiff-appellant. It will be open to the petitioner to apply to the Appellate Court itself for vacating the interim direction given and if such an application is filed, the Court will dispose it of expeditiously and any prayer for police protection will await the adjudication that shall be made on the application filed by the petitioner for vacating the interim direction. 2.

The revision petition is disposed of as above, dispensing with notice to the respondent.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE April 25, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.04.27 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document