Maan Singh And ANR v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-1966-2020 [ 1 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1966-2020 Date of Decision: 17.01.2022 Maan Singh and another..........................................Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab........................................................... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL ...

(through video conferencing)

Present:

Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Jaspreet Kaur, AAG, Punjab.

Ms. Promila Nain, Advocate for the complainant.

....

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.170 dated 28.12.2019 under Sections 498-A, 406 IPC registered at Police Station Chhajli, District Sangrur.

Learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance of order dated 15.11.2021, the petitioner had joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that the dispute stands amicably settled between the parties. Therefore, the present petition be allowed. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Pinjor Singh, does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. She further submits that in the wake of the parties having amicably resolved their dispute a cancellation report was filed RUPINDER KAUR 2022.01.18 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-1966-2020 [ 2 ] before the trial court concerned and, which has been accepted. I have heard the learned counsel.

In the facts and circumstances as enumerated above, the instant petition is allowed and order dated 15.11.2021 is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) 17.01.2022 JUDGE rupi Note: Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable:

Yes / No RUPINDER KAUR 2022.01.18 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document