Pritam Singh v. Manmohan Singh & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2957 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision.28.04.2016 Pritam Singh .......Petitioner Vs.

Manmohan Singh and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The defendant is aggreived that the Appellate Court has allowed for amendment of the plaint without even awarding heavy costs. Costs is invariably a matter of discretion and in a litigation between son and father, if the amendment is brought to conform to the description as found in the village records, it ought not to be taken as causing any serious prejudice. The plaintiff will succeed or fail by the case of family settlement which he has pleaded and it will not matter that a khasra number which was wrongly described originally is corrected at the appellate stage.

2.

I will find no cause for interference with the order already passed. The revision petition is dismissed.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE April 28, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.05.09 14:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document