Arun Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP No. 1282-2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB ANDHARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 1282-2020 Date of decision:-17.01.2020 Arun Kumar .....Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana and ors.

....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Ms. Monika Jangra, Advocate for the petitioners.

RITU BAHRI, J.(Oral) Petitioner has completed his Master of Art in Psychology and completed his Master of Philosphy in Psychology in July, 2008. He completed his PHD in 2014. The petitioner worked as Extension Lecturer in Psychology from 2006 to 2016, as per experience certificate (P-2 colly). The claim of the petitioner has been rejected vide letter dated 26.11.2019 on the ground that her experience certificate cannot be treated to be eligible. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the workload is still available in respondent No. 3 to 15 and he be allowed liberty to approach respondent Nos. 3 to 15 for his adjustment. Issue notice of motion.

On asking of the Court, Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Without commenting upon merits of the case, this petition at this stage is being disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach respondent Nos. 3 to 15 for his adjustment as Extension Lecturer as the GAURAV ARORA 2020.01.21 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No. 1282-2020 workload is available. However, his claim cannot be rejected on the ground of not having experience.

(RITU BAHRI) 17.01.2020 JUDGE G Arora Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No GAURAV ARORA 2020.01.21 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh