Priyanka v. Sahil Goyal

TA-66-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.110 TA-66-2024 Date of Decision: 20.01.2025
 ....Applicant

Versus

  



.....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Raj Kapoor Malik, Advocate for the applicant.

None for the respondent.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
 

 

    

             

!

"    
    

       #$    

# "        %&$ ' "       

  &  '  & 

(   )  * &  #  

 $ +, "     "  &  #  "  

    -     

 It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 04.10.2022. However, due to the matrimonial discord, the parties are residing separate. No child was born from the said wedlock. Rather, from the previous marriage of the applicant, there is a son aged about 7 years, who is in the care and custody of Sonu 2025.01.20 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC

TA-66-2024 the applicant. The applicant is not having any source of earning and thus, it is difficult for her to commute a distance of about 150 kilometres, to defend the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Even, the applicant has filed the divorce petition, which is pending in the Courts at Kaithal. In view of the aforesaid fact situation and also considering the position of law about preference to be given to the convenience of the wife in the transfer applications relating to the matrimonial dispute, more particularly while the applicant is taking care of a minor son, the transfer application is allowed and                      

!

"  
 

  #$  

# "    & %&$' "

"  '  & 

(   ) 
.     #

#$ %&$' ""  /     0")  - /    0") "        %&$' ") +, "     # %&$' ") "    &

&

$

 (ARCHANA PURI) 20.01.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No Sonu 2025.01.20 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC