Joya Devi And ANR. v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-535-2023 with CRM-W-70-2023 Decided on : 01.03.2023 Joya Devi and another . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Harpreet S. Rakhra, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana **** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral) Order dated 19.01.2023 says as under:

"This is the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of private respondents.

It is noticed by this Court that both the petitioners and respondents No. 4 to 8 are permanent residence of V.P.O Gaur Dayampur, District Hardoi (UP). There is nothing attached with the petition to justify their residences in the State of Haryana, Punjab or U.T.

Adjourned to 30.01.2023.

Meanwhile, counsel for the petitioners will place on record some evidence to show prima facie that they are residents of State of Haryana, Punjab or U.T and if so, since when, and learned State counsel may also verify the said aspect."

KAVITA NAIN 2023.03.01 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment

CRWP-535-2023 with CRM-W-70-2023 - 2 - Today, on the very outset, counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the present petition.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE March 01, 2023 k.nain Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No KAVITA NAIN 2023.03.01 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment