Dayanand v. Mahinder And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No.14520-CII of 2016 and C.R. No.3052 of 2016 Date of Decision.29.07.2016 Dayanand .......Petitioner Vs.

Mahinder and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner/applicant.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty of this Court to withdraw the revision petition through C.M. No.14520-CII of 2016 on the ground that the issue regarding the court fee has already been framed by the trial Court and therefore, no cause of action survives. The application is duly supported by affidavit.

The application is allowed and the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE July 29, 2016 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned No Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.08.01 11:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document