Surinder Singh v. Gurbachan Singh

CR No.3075 of 2016 (O&M) {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3075 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision:02.05.2016 Surinder Singh ... Petitioner Vs.

Gurbachan Singh ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff submits that when the petitioner-plaintiff was leading evidence, an application calling upon the defendant-respondent to give specimen signatures was moved and order in this respect was also passed. Defendant did not give the specimen signatures. In cross examination, he was volunteer to give specimen signatures and in this regard, an application was also filed.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff and appraised the paper book.

Once such situation arose, in my view, the petitionerplaintiff is at liberty to take all the pleas, as per the provisions of Section 114(g) of the Indian Evidence Act but not in the manner and mode which has been adopted.

SAVITA DEVI KADIAN 2016.05.06 13:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CR No.3075 of 2016 (O&M) {2} At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty of the Court for withdrawal of the present revision petition with liberty to take all legal pleas at the time of final arguments. Ordered accordingly.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE May 02, 2016 savita SAVITA DEVI KADIAN 2016.05.06 13:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh