The Ramgarh Sardaran Cooperative Society And Another v. Ramesh Kumar Singla And Others

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.109 of 2021 Date of decision: November 20th, 2025 The Ramgarh Sardarn Multipurpose Co-operative Agricultural Sabha and another .....Petitioners

Versus

Ramesh Kumar Singla and others .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL

Present:

Mr. Shamsher Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Sushant Kareer, Advocate for the respondents.

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1.

This is a civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 16.10.2020 (Annexure P-10) passed by the Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, vide which application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC filed by the petitioners had been dismissed.

2.

On 22.01.2021, a coordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order:

"Present:- Mr. Shamsher Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioners ***** Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia argues that the appellate Court has found that the petitioners were in possession of two rooms and office as a tenant. Thus, it could not have allowed the appeal in toto. The petitioners

-2were atleast entitled to partial injunction in respect of the property admittedly in its possession.

Notice of motion.

Ms. Monika Thakur, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the caveator-respondent and waives service. Mr. Hari Om Jindal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 4 and 5 and waives service. Adjourned to 24.05.2021.

Meanwhile, the respondents are restrained from interfering in the tenanted premises of the petitioners. January 22, 2021"

3.

It is not in dispute that the said order is continuing till date. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the suit which was filed in the year 2018 has now reached the stage of defendant evidence. During the course of arguments, it has been jointly submitted that the trial Court be requested to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible and the interim order dated 22.01.2021 be continued till the time the suit is decided. It is further submitted that the trial Court be requested to decide the case independently on the basis of the evidence and documents on record, uninfluenced by the observations made in the order dated 22.01.2021. 4.

Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances and the fair stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, the present revision petition is disposed of with the following observations/directions:

(i) The trial Court is requested to decide the suit which has been pending since 2018 as expeditiously as possible. All the parties

-3concerned would fully assist the trial Court in the expeditious disposal of the case.

(ii) The interim order dated 22.01.2021 would continue till the time the suit is decided. The grant and continuation of the said interim order would not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and the trial Court would decide the case independently on the basis of the documents, pleadings of the parties and evidence on the record, after hearing all the parties concerned.

November 20th, 2025 (VIKAS BAHL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No