Lajja Ram v. Yashpal Yadav

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

COCP No. 322 of 2020 Date of Decision: 28.01.2020 Lajja Ram

...Petitioner

VERSUS

Yashpal Yadav, Deputy Commissioner, Faridabad ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that representation dated 22.08.2016 moved by the petitioner has not been decided within a period of four months in compliance of order dated 21.03.2017 passed in CWP-2899-2017.

Instant petition is beyond the period of limitation as provided under Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, as such, no reason is made out to initiate any proceedings on this petition. Dismissed.

However, the petitioner will be at liberty to avail other legal remedy including filing of fresh representation. ( SURINDER GUPTA ) January 28, 2020 JUDGE jk Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JITENDER KUMAR 2020.01.28 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh