Majid Son Of Badhan v. Mohd.Yakub

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 3116 of 2015 Date of Decision: 01.06.2016 Majid ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

Mohd. Yakub ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shekher Dhawan.

1.

Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?

Yes To be referred to reporters or not?

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Yes

Present:

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Bawa, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Shekher Dhawan, J.

Present petition under Section 115 CPC for setting aside order dated 13.3.2015, passed by learned District Judge, Mewat whereby application, filed by the petitioner/appellant under Order 41 Rule 3A CPC, was dismissed.

Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that execution petition has already been disposed of by the Court below having been rendered infructuous.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that possession of the property is still with the present petitioner and as such present petition has not become infructuous.

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2016.06.02 15:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Civil Revision No. 3116 of 2015 In view of the fact that present petition is challenge to the order dated 13.3.2015, passed by learned District Judge, Mewat and execution petition was filed in pursuant to that. The said execution petition has already been disposed of by the Court below as having been rendered infructuous. As such, present petition is not maintainable and the same also stands dismissed.

(Shekher Dhawan) Judge June 01, 2016 "DK"

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2016.06.02 15:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document