Madan Lal Sharma v. Krishan Pal & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.3165 of 2016 Date of Decision.30.05.2016 Madan Lal Sharma .....Petitioner Vs.

Krishan Pal and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Arun Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sushil K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vineet Sehgal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

Both the counsel agree that Sh. Subhash Adlakha, Advocate could be appointed as local commissioner. The order already passed stands modified to allow for the local commissioner to carry out the warrant issued for the purpose for which the commission was appointed. 2.

The civil revision is disposed of with the above observations. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE May 30, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.06.01 14:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document