Puneet Kumar And ORS v. State Of Haryana And Another
!" # $%&%!'( )* * + , **** % %!' -& . -&/& , *** &0!'# ' & ( 12 ,* , + ,
!
" #
"
$ % &
+ , * *
- '
( ) $ *+, % -- .
&/0 ---&--12342/520.3461/5+73 --6-1234 4$
%$ *( !$ ) $$ ( / &/&138 9&4(
& $ $ - '
7
$ &/ &/&1
( 7 :+) $ $ $
& &.
&/&1 ( ;
$7*( (
(( ! ( *+,) ) '
( $ ! '
* 7
!
"# $ 7
2.& 7 $ 9 ( )
$ 7 ) ( '
) $
<(
7 $
"
%
!
#% ( ( 7
( (! 7 ) $
9
( '
1= $
9 "57. The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences under Section 320 of the Code. Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation
- but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court.
xxx xxx xxx. "
= + 9 $ $ 7 $$(( 34 9
7 ) $ *+, ) 9
( ( ( ! '
( $ $ $ () .
, ! *+,% -- .
&/0 ---&--12342/520.3461/5+73 --6-1234 4$
%$ *( ! ) $) )
34 ( / &/&138 9&4 ( !, &////:9( * + >,7 $
9.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
+ , )* *
'# 0 #$:
?:% , (
?:%