Chand Singh Through Lr. Mukhtiar Singh v. Amar Kaur

Civil Revision No. 3210 of 2015 (O&M) -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 3210 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2015.

Chand Singh (deceased) through LR ......Petitioner

Versus

Amar Kaur .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present:

Mr. S.S.Salar, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** SABINA, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 13.4.2015 (Annexure P-4).

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record available on the file carefully. In the present case, Chand Singh (since deceased) had filed suit for declaration challenging the sale deeds dated 17.7.2009 and 12.12.2008. Chand Singh (since deceased) had filed suit challenging the sale deeds executed by him on the ground of fraud and misrepresentation. During the pendency of the suit, defendant moved an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Vide the impugned order, plaintiff was directed to affix ad valorem Court fee. The learned Trial Court had rightly directed the plaintiff to affix ad valorem Court fee as plaintiff Chand Singh (since deceased) was the executant of the sale deeds and had challenged the same. Therefore, the plaintiff was required to affix GURPREET SINGH 2015.07.17 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Civil Revision No. 3210 of 2015 (O&M) -2ad valorem Court fee.

No ground for interference by this Court is made out. Dismissed.

(SABINA) JUDGE July 14, 2015 Gurpreet GURPREET SINGH 2015.07.17 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh