Seema v. Promila
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.01.23 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-283-2017 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CR-283-2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.01.2019 Seema ... Petitioner
Versus
Promila ... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:
Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Fariyad Singh Virk, Advocate and Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the respondent.
**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) The short point involved in the case hand is whether the revision petition can be kept pending against the dismissal of the application for amendment of the plaint, once the suit had already been withdrawn on 22.12.2017. The answer is 'No'. Accordingly, the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of as such. However, liberty is granted to revive the case, in case, revision petition filed against the dismissal of the application for recalling of the order dated 22.12.2017 is allowed.
16.01.2019 Yogesh Sharma ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No