Raj Kumar v. Nirmala Midha And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2870 of 2017 Date of decision:30.05.2018 Raj Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.
Nirmala Midha and others ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Nikunj Dhawan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Both the learned counsel counsel for the parties are ad idem that present revision petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the aforementioned fact, the present revision petition is disposed of having been rendered infructuous. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE May 30, 2018 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2018.05.31 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh