Santokh Singh v. Indu Bala

Anuradha 2016.05.19 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR No.3271 of 2016 Sr. No. 107

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR No.3271 of 2016 (O&M) Decided on : 16.05.2016 Santokh Singh ......Petitioner

Versus

Indu Bala .......Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI

Present:

Mr. V.K.Sandhir, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sharad Mehra, Advocate for the respondent.

****

1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed against the concurrent orders dated 16.05.2014 and 15.01.2016 passed by the learned Courts below evicting the petitioner from the demised premises.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that the petitioner will not press this petition on merits and will vacate the premises voluntarily on or before 30.04.2017 without forcing the respondent to file an execution petition and will continue to pay the monthly contractual rent in advance by the 7th of every month, and pay the other admissible charges regularly. He further undertakes to pay up to date of arrears of rent, if any, within a period of one month from today.

CR No.3271 of 2016 Learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, has also accepted this offer on the condition that the petitioner will file an undertaking to the above effect before the Executing Court within month, with the condition that in the event of any default, this petition should be deemed to be dismissed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has accepted this condition. The revision petition is disposed of in the above terms. (AJAY TEWARI) May 16, 2016 JUDGE anuradha