Romesh Parkash v. Shakuntla Sharma

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR No.3058 of 2006 (O&M) Dated of decision:15.10.2018 Romesh Parkash ..Petitioner

Versus

Smt. Shakuntla Sharma .Respondent
 


 

  Present:4 Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Chadha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sharad Mehla, Advocate for the respondent. ****



 Learned counsel for the respondent submits that this petition filed by the tenant challenging the order dated 30.03.2006 passed by learned Appellate Authority, Ludhiana, has been rendered infructuous as demised premises has since been vacated.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no specific instructions thereof.

In view of the fact that learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to take specific instructions despite opportunity having been afforded and keeping in view the specific statement of learned counsel for the respondent, this petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

Needless to say, petitioner is at liberty to seek revival of the petition if the averments as above are not as per the factual position.  

           October 15, 2018 Ishwar ISHWAR SINGH 2018.10.20 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document